Free Essay Outline Templates
Five templates you can copy in one click — a standard essay outline plus argumentative, narrative, analytical and reflective. No email, no download, no PDF.
Standard essay outline
The default five-part shape. Works for most coursework essays where the brief does not specify a form.
ESSAY OUTLINE Working title: Thesis (one arguable sentence): 1. INTRODUCTION (~10% of the word count) Hook — a specific case, number or observation: Context the reader needs (2–3 sentences max): Thesis, stated last: 2. BODY PARAGRAPH 1 (~20%) Claim (a full sentence, not a topic): Evidence needed: Why this evidence supports the claim: Link to the next paragraph: 3. BODY PARAGRAPH 2 (~20%) Claim: Evidence needed: Why this evidence supports the claim: Link to the next paragraph: 4. BODY PARAGRAPH 3 (~20%) Claim: Evidence needed: Why this evidence supports the claim: 5. CONCLUSION (~10%) What follows now the argument is established: What it costs, or what it leaves open: Final sentence (concrete, not grand): CHECKS BEFORE YOU WRITE [ ] Could an informed reader disagree with the thesis? [ ] Does each claim need the paragraph before it? (Swap two — does anything break?) [ ] Do the word counts add up to the target? [ ] What evidence do I not yet have?
Argumentative essay outline
Adds the counterargument paragraph, which is the part that separates a strong argumentative essay from a competent one.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY OUTLINE Question: Thesis (contestable — a reader must be able to disagree): 1. INTRODUCTION (~10%) Hook: Context: Thesis: 2. REASON 1 — your strongest (~15%) Claim: Evidence: Reasoning that connects them: 3. REASON 2 (~15%) Claim: Evidence: Reasoning: 4. REASON 3 (~15%) Claim: Evidence: Reasoning: 5. COUNTERARGUMENT (~20%) The STRONGEST genuine objection, stated as its best advocate would state it: Why a reasonable person holds it: Your answer, on the merits: What you concede (something, or the rebuttal is not credible): 6. CONCLUSION (~10%) What follows: What it costs: CHECKS [ ] Is the counterargument the strong version, or a straw man? [ ] Have I conceded anything at all? [ ] Does every hedge mark real uncertainty?
Narrative essay outline
A story structure, not a five-paragraph one. The column that matters is what happens, not what is claimed.
NARRATIVE ESSAY OUTLINE The one event (a few hours at most — narrow it): The meaning it carries (write it here; do NOT write it in the essay): 1. OPENING SCENE (~15%) Start mid-action. What is happening in the first sentence? Sensory detail that puts the reader there: 2. ORIENTATION (~15%) The minimum the reader needs — who, where, what is at stake: (Fold into the action; do not stop the story to explain.) 3. RISING ACTION (~30%) Event: Event: Event: What raises the pressure each time: 4. THE TURN (~20%) The moment something changes: How it is SHOWN rather than stated: 5. RESOLUTION (~20%) What is different afterwards: Where to stop (earlier than feels comfortable): CHECKS [ ] Does the word "realised" appear? Cut it. [ ] Is there a moral in the last paragraph? Delete the paragraph. [ ] Is this one scene, or a whole summer?
Analytical essay outline
Built around mechanisms. Each body paragraph isolates one device and shows it working.
ANALYTICAL ESSAY OUTLINE Subject: The specific aspect being analysed: Thesis — a claim about HOW or WHY, not what: 1. INTRODUCTION (~10%) Open on the specific feature (not the work as a whole): Thesis naming the mechanism: 2. MECHANISM 1 (~20%) The device or component: Short evidence (quote the smallest fragment that carries it): Analysis — what it does to the reader (aim for 3x the length of the evidence): 3. MECHANISM 2 (~20%) Device: Evidence: Analysis: 4. MECHANISM 3 (~20%) Device: Evidence: Analysis: 5. COMPLICATION (~15%) Where the pattern breaks, or the plausible rival reading: Why your reading survives it: 6. CONCLUSION (~10%) What the mechanism reveals that was invisible before the analysis: CHECKS [ ] Does each sentence answer "how?" rather than "what?" [ ] Is any paragraph more than half quotation? [ ] Have I named a device without analysing it?
Reflective essay outline (Gibbs)
Follows Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle, which is what most nursing, education and social-work rubrics mark against.
REFLECTIVE ESSAY OUTLINE — GIBBS' CYCLE The incident (anonymised): 1. DESCRIPTION (~15% — keep it SHORT) What happened, factually: 2. FEELINGS (~10%) What I thought and felt at the time (honestly, not professionally): 3. EVALUATION (~15%) What went well: What did not: 4. ANALYSIS (~30% — the marks are here) Why did it happen? Theory / literature that explains it: How that reframes the incident: 5. CONCLUSION (~15%) What I understand now that I did not before (specific): 6. ACTION PLAN (~15%) What I will do differently, concretely enough to actually do: CHECKS [ ] Is description under 15% of the word count? [ ] Does the analysis cite literature? [ ] Could someone follow my action plan on their next shift? [ ] Did I choose an incident that still bothers me, or one that went well?